i remember andrew posting his
Friday, October 19th, 2001i remember andrew posting his top places (according to a computer) to live a while ago, and i promised myself i’d do the same (for my own reference). i took the test, but don’t remember the results. i think the number one place was either somewhere in rhode island or connecticut, and portland, or was in my top 10, too. you can do it youself at findyourspot.com, and here are my new results (which seem to be almost identical to last time):
- hartford, connecticut - looks nice from the pictures, but the “insurance capital of the world”? east coast drivers also drive me nuts, but i don’t think that would really affect my judgement. i mean - it’s just driving, right?
- portland, or - is alright, if you’re into that. i’ve always been creeped out by the city, although i do know a lot of very nice people there. it’s just that when you cross the burnside bridge… also, the church of elvis is there.
- providence, rhode island - 41 miles to boston and smaller than the other cities so far on the list. it looks inviting, though if the town providence is anything like the show, no thank you. lowest crime rate in the northeast, and the cheapest place to live in New England ain’t bad, either.
- new haven, connecticut - first two sentences included “Yale University”, “first settlement” and “group of puritans.” cost of living is 22% above national average. next.
- boston, massacusetts - population capping 3 million, m.i.t. and boston harbor. rent is probably expensive, and i’m not will hunting.
- baltimore, maryland - only the second place on this list that i’ve actually been to. being there and driving wasn’t as great as i remember, but i did have a good time down by the harbor. cheap place to live, too. turns out, it’s probably one of the most likely (out of the top 6) places i’ll end up living in the next year.
- eugene, or - i’ve driven through the town, i think i actually tried to get something to eat there, and all i remember was how many porn stores there were. for some reason, i’ve never really been thrilled with the idea of living anywhere in oregon (see #2).
- danbury, connecticut - where? avg. household income $80,000 (which doesn’t mean much to me, because there’s probably no way i’ll make that much, it just means i’d be living near people that did).
- corvallis, or - see #7
- chicago, il - i still don’t know why chicago has this mecca-like quality for me, but my short visit there this summer confirmed it. as far as i’m concerned, this should be number 1, and actually is as far as the liklihood of where i’ll be moving. home of the first ferris wheel, you know. cost of living is only 9% above the national average, and unemployment is below the national average as well. yep. i wish i could say something bad about it - oh yeah, traffic sucked.
- charleston, west virginia - smallest population on the list, 53K. average two bedroom apartment costs less than $500 per month though. a little inland for my taste.
- milwaukee, wisconsin - 19th largest city in the nation, 140 county parks, and 14,000 acres for camping. 80% less crime than chicago, and housing is cheaper too. hmm. interesting.
other cities included: salem - OR, albuquerque - NM (boo!), frederick - MD, sheboygan - WI, medford - OR, little rock - AR (what?), honolulu - HI (nice), worcester - MA, bend - OR, madison - WI, eau claire - WI, champaign/urbana - IL





